01Florida’s notice requirement is often the central issue
Section 768.0755, Florida Statutes, generally requires a person who slips on a transitory foreign substance in a business establishment to prove that the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have acted to remedy it.
Constructive knowledge may be shown with circumstantial evidence that the condition existed long enough that reasonable care should have discovered it, or that it occurred with regularity and was foreseeable. Footprints, cart tracks, dirt, drying, recurring leaks, employee proximity, inspection timing, and prior incidents may matter.
02Publix controls evidence that may disappear
Store video may show the source of a spill, how long it remained, employee activity, inspections, the fall, and the condition immediately afterward. Inspection logs, cleaning records, photographs, incident materials, and internal communications may also become important.
A focused preservation request should identify the store, date, time window, location, relevant camera angles, and categories of records. Waiting can narrow what remains available.
03The claim may extend beyond a liquid on the floor
Not every Publix injury is governed by the transitory-substance statute. A defective display, falling object, broken cart, uneven walkway, negligent security condition, or other fixed hazard may require a different liability analysis.
The responsible party may also depend on who controlled the area. A landlord, maintenance contractor, vendor, or another entity could share responsibility depending on the location and contracts.